While it is notable that her question actually is an argument and that it actually refernces the text of the constitutione, what is most telling is how she rights. She defines equal protection not as equal respect for our unalienable rights, but as an equal share in the power sharing arrangement. That is, do unto others as they do unto you rather than an objection to racial quotas, or by extension, slavery. Democrats have always viewed the Declaration as a cynical ploy to rationalize rebellion and now certain Democrats angling to get a better cut of the loot.